Readings 11/7

Three Interesting Things:
1.) I think that MTM is super helpful and that there should be a scaling or set of regulations put in place where patients conditions are categorized. Out of these categories, patients should then be obligated by physician request to have a MTM appointment with pharmacists in order to better there condition journey. This could be a one time or multi-scheduled event.
2.) Hospitalizations and expenditures increase in the non MTM groups and decrease for the  in MTM groups, This shows that the patients who have more information about their conditions and medications are better equipped. They still go to the pharmacy the same number of times but they do not see as many hospital trips and their costs are decreased.
3.) I think it is interesting that they talked about implementing MTM but at different level. This means that the more complex conditions will receive a more complex MTM consultation while the lower level ones will be more basic. This can help in lowering costs for patients which can potentially make it implemented more in common health care treatment practice.

Three Questions:
1.) Are MTM consultations covered by insurance? Do they have to be part of the treatment plan to be included?
2.) How do you make MTM non in house and more public?
3.) Can MTM be implemented in Medicare and Medicaid?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Readings for 11/21

Reading for 9/24

Reflection 10/27